Security · Code Audit · Vulnerability Detection

Secure code review services manual & automated audits.

We find vulnerabilities in your code before attackers do. Manual expert review combined with automated SAST, dependency scanning, and secrets detection. You get a prioritized report with fixes, not just a list.

Request a code review View all services

What we review

Every layer of your application

🔐

Backend APIs

Authentication flows, authorization logic, input validation, SQL injection, SSRF, insecure deserialization, and business logic vulnerabilities in your API layer.

🌐

Frontend Applications

XSS vectors, CSP misconfigurations, insecure client-side storage, exposed secrets in bundles, DOM manipulation vulnerabilities, and third-party script risks.

📱

Mobile Code

Insecure data storage, certificate pinning, reverse engineering resistance, API key exposure, biometric bypass, and insecure inter-process communication in iOS and Android apps.

🖥

Infrastructure as Code

Dockerfiles, CI/CD pipelines, Terraform configs, and Kubernetes manifests. Misconfigured permissions, exposed ports, hardcoded secrets, and insecure defaults.

How we work

Manual expertise + automated tooling

01 — Scope

Define review boundaries

We identify critical code paths, high-risk modules, and trust boundaries. You tell us what matters most; we prioritize accordingly. White-box access with full repository visibility.

02 — Analyze

Manual + automated review

Expert manual review of security-critical code paths combined with automated SAST (Semgrep, SonarQube), dependency scanning (Snyk, Trivy), and secrets detection across the entire codebase.

03 — Fix & Verify

Deliver fixes, not just findings

Prioritized report with severity, reproduction steps, and root cause analysis. Then we fix the vulnerabilities and verify each fix through re-testing. You get secure code, not a PDF.

Standards & Tools

Industry-standard methodology

SonarQube Semgrep Snyk Trivy OWASP ASVS CWE Top 25 OWASP Top 10 Gitleaks Bandit ESLint Security Dependabot CVSS Scoring

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Automated tools (SAST) scan for known patterns like SQL injection, XSS, and insecure dependencies. Manual review catches what tools miss: business logic flaws, race conditions, authentication bypasses, and architectural weaknesses. We combine both for comprehensive coverage.
We review Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Rust, Java, C#, PHP, Ruby, and Solidity. Our team has deep expertise in FastAPI, Django, Express, Next.js, React, and React Native codebases. For less common stacks, we evaluate on a case-by-case basis.
A focused review of a single service or module takes 3-5 business days. A comprehensive full-codebase review for a medium application takes 1-2 weeks. Large monoliths or multi-service architectures take 2-4 weeks. We provide a timeline estimate after initial scoping.
Yes. Unlike firms that only deliver reports, we fix the vulnerabilities we find. Our deliverable includes the audit report with severity classifications and the actual code fixes, verified through re-testing. You get clean, secure code — not just a list of problems.
At minimum, before every major release and annually for compliance. High-risk applications (fintech, healthcare, e-commerce) should review quarterly. We also recommend integrating SAST into your CI/CD pipeline for continuous automated scanning between manual reviews.

Ready to secure your codebase?

Send us your repo. We'll find what the scanners miss.

Request a review Explore services